notesum.ai
Published at October 21WildOcc: A Benchmark for Off-Road 3D Semantic Occupancy Prediction
cs.LG
cs.AI
Released Date: October 21, 2024
Authors: Heng Zhai, Jilin Mei, Chen Min, Liang Chen, Fangzhou Zhao, Yu Hu

| Method | Modality | IoU | mIoU | Grass | Tree | Bush | Puddle | Mud | Barrier | Rubble | Input Size | 2D Backbone |
| SurroundOcc[3] | C | 28.7 | 10.2 | 23.7 | 20.4 | 20.5 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 2.2 | R101-DCN | |
| OccFormer[31] | C | 27.2 | 10.5 | 24.3 | 21.1 | 20.7 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 3.6 | R101 | |
| C-CONet[2] | C | 23.6 | 8.8 | 23.5 | 10.8 | 19.2 | 0.3 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 1.7 | R101 | |
| FB-Occ[1] | C | 28.4 | 10.6 | 24.1 | 21.6 | 20.4 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | R101 | |
| C-OFFOcc(Ours) | C | 29.7 | 11.2 | 24.6 | 23.8 | 22.1 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 3.2 | R101 | |
| L-CONet[2] | L | 32.4 | 11.0 | 25.3 | 26.7 | 23.4 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | - | - |
| M-CONet[2] | M | 31.6 | 13.6 | 27.2 | 30.5 | 26.3 | 0.5 | 7.1 | 1.2 | 2.3 | R101 | |
| L-OFFOcc(Ours) | L | 35.3 | 11.6 | 22.8 | 28.5 | 25.0 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | - | - |
| M-OFFOcc(Ours) | M | 32.8 | 14.8 | 28.6 | 33.4 | 27.5 | 0.9 | 6.8 | 1.7 | 4.6 | R101 | |
| C-* denotes camera method, L-* denotes LiDAR method and M-* denotes camera-LiDAR fusion method. | ||||||||||||
| C represents the modality is camera, L represents the modality is LiDAR and M represents the modality is camera-LiDAR fusion. | ||||||||||||
| Underline means the best performance of camera method, and bold means the best performance of camera-LiDAR fusion method. | ||||||||||||