notesum.ai
Published at December 3U-Net in Medical Image Segmentation: A Review of Its Applications Across Modalities
eess.IV
cs.AI
cs.CV
cs.LG
Released Date: December 3, 2024
Authors: Fnu Neha1, Deepshikha Bhati, Deepak Kumar Shukla, Sonavi Makarand Dalvi, Nikolaos Mantzou, Safa Shubbar
Aff.: 1Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA

| Study | Modality | Focus Area | Methodology | Performance Metrics |
| Deng et al. (2024) [54] | X-ray (Anterior-Posterior and Lateral) | Vertebrae instance segmentation for spinal disorder diagnosis | Enhanced U-Net architecture using ConvNeXt as encoder, Informational feature enhancement (IFE) module for texture and edge enhancement, attention in bottleneck, and Residual Network (ResNet) blocks in decoder. | Accuracy: 88.0%, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC): 90.6%, Mean intersection over Union (IoU): 79.3% |
| Haennah et al. (2024) [55] | Chest X-ray (CXR) | Early diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) | Classification with Fused U-Net Convolutional Neural Network (FUCNN) optimized by Chaotic System-based Moth Flame Optimization (CSMFO) | Accuracy: 98.5%, Sensitivity: 98.6%, Specificity: 98.9%, Precision: 98.9% |
| Sharma et al. (2024) [56] | Chest X-ray (CXR) | Tuberculosis Detection | U-Net for lung segmentation, Xception for classification, with gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) for visualization | Segmentation: Accuracy: 96.5%, Jaccard Index: 90.4%, Dice Coefficient Index (DCI): 94.8%, Classification: Accuracy: 99.3%, Precision: 99.3%, Recall: 99.3%, F1-score: 99.3% |
| Ying et al. (2024) [57] | Clinical X-ray | Dental Caries Detection | Comparison of object detection: You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOv5), Detection Transformer (DETR), and segmentation networks: U-Net, and transformer-based U-Net | F1-score: YOLOv5 (87.0%), DETR (82.0%); U-Net (80.0%); transformer-based U-Net (86.0%) |
| Budagam et al. (2024) [58] | Dental X-ray (Panoramic) | Teeth segmentation and recognition | U-Net and YOLO version 8 (BB-UNet) | mean average precision (mAP): 72.9%, Precision: 94.3%, Recall: 92.3%, DCI: 84.0% |
| Lyu et al. (2023) [59] | Chest X-ray | Lung and heart segmentation | Multiple tasking Wasserstein generative adversarial network U-Net | Dice Similarity: 95.3%, Precision: 96.4%, F1-score: 95.9%, IoU (Lung): 81.4%, IoU (Heart): 74.6%, DCI (Lung): 85.2%, DCI (Heart): 71.2% |
| Wu et al. (2021) [60] | Chest X-ray (CXR) | COVID-19 Detection | Modified U-Net-based CNN model for binary classification (COVID-19 vs. Normal) and multiclass classification (COVID-19 vs. Normal vs. Viral Pneumonia) | Binary classification: Accuracy: 99.5%; Multiclass classification: Accuracy: 95.4% |
| Mosquera-Berrazueta et al. (2023) [61] | Chest X-ray (CXR) | Tuberculosis lesion detection and segmentation | an optimized U-net variant, using ten-fold stratified cross-validation | DCI: 92.0%, IoU: 86.0% |
| Agarwal et al. (2023) [62] | Chest X-ray (CXR) and CT-scan | Lung segmentation | Proposed a UNet-based model incorporating residual learning and attention mechanisms; | average DCI: 96.4%; Average Jaccard Index (JI): 93.1% |
| Kholiavchenko et al. (2020) [63] | Chest X-ray (CXR) | Organ segmentation (lung fields, heart, clavicles) | Augmented state-of-the-art CNNs (UNet, LinkNet with ResNeXt, Tiramisu with DenseNet) with organ contour information; | JI: 97.1% (lung fields), 93.3% (heart), 90.3% (clavicles) |