|
Basis
|
Formula
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Suitability
|
|
B-splines
|
|
Flexibility and smoothness
Local support
Efficient computation
|
Cannot handle large complex structures.
|
Efficient for small-scale problems with local refinement needs
|
|
Chebyshev Polynomials
|
|
Numerical stability
Efficient evaluation
Global approximation
|
Global nature
Difficulties in local refinement
|
High numerical stability and efficiency for global approximations
|
|
Radial Basis Functions (RBFs)
|
|
Flexibility and adaptability
Local and global support
Mesh-free method
|
Computational cost
Parameter sensitivity
|
Best for complex geometries and moving boundaries due to mesh-free nature and adaptability
|
|
Hermite Polynomials
|
|
Suitable for Gaussian problems
Orthogonal
|
Less flexible for non-Gaussian features
|
Gaussian-related Navier-Stokes problems
|
|
Wavelet Transformation
|
|
Captures localized features
Multi-resolution analysis
|
Complex implementation
Selecting basis is crucial
|
Problems with localized features and discontinuities
|
|
Legendre Polynomials
|
|
Orthogonal basis
Numerical stability
|
Global support
|
Polynomial approximation and integration
|
|
Gaussian Process Basis Functions
|
|
Probabilistic interpretation
Flexibility in Basis functions choice
|
Computationally expensive
|
Problems requiring uncertainty quantification
|